Weeknote – 14th April 2024 – Meaningful and pointless translations

A sundial on a patio, in front of a green lawn.

Blimey, I’m actually writing a weeknote during the week it happened. This is progress.

Work Stuff

Lots more discussion about OKRs at work this week. They remain one of the most misunderstood things in Product, for something so simple. But they’re also a mindset and culture, which makes them fragile. It’s far too easy for OKRs to become just “this is your to-do list from on high for the next three months”, and there are all sorts of organisational behaviours which can contribute to that. I’ve definitely seen in government and elsewhere the idea that OKRs are disempowering because it means you can’t have long-term plans…when the idea is that your long-term plans should be expressed through a sequence of OKRs. They allow for some delivery flexibility – around whether you want to keep going with the same objective for another quarter based on results to date, or move to the next objective in the queue – but they really shouldn’t be a framework for throwing everything up in the air each quarter and starting again.

Of course objectives aren’t a democratic decision, just like strategy sometimes involves hard and painful choices that not everyone will be in favour of, but it’s the responsibility of leaders to listen to potential new opportunities – and what end users are saying. Objectives are a leadership function, based on all their understanding of the organisational context, but they should be formed from a wide variety of inputs. Otherwise it’s just waterfall in disguise. SAFe but worse.

One of my interventions in this area, like I said last week, is to ask the squads what discovery they’re doing in Q4 to inform plans for Q1 (we work to a weird financial year that flips over June/July). I worry there’s a chance that it’ll get forgotten, or pushed aside by the day-to-day so I also made the slightly bold move of putting a reminder in the team calendar that I was hoping for an update on Q1 discovery during their checkins in late May. It’s one of those odd things where as a leader you’re trying to say “I did mean it, and this should help you remember, but it’ll be ok if it’s gone a bit wrong this time round – because we’re all trying to get onto a front foot”. I think there’ll be a little bit of panic this time, but hopefully that’ll lead to a smoother Q2 discovery during Q1. As I always used to say about service assessments “the best way to pass is to have done the right work the right way”.

When I first started in the new gig, I had to quite radically reshape how we handled OKRs within about a fortnight. It wasn’t a joyful experience for many of us (including me), but I realised I was going to be spending three months defending something I knew wasn’t right – and burning through political/social capital in the process. Or I could be a bit of an awkward sod, and start building trust in what the teams were doing from a solid base. It was a horrible decision, but I’d do it again.

I had a minor version of that earlier in the week, when I was looking at one squad’s KRs and realised two of them were basically the same:

  • Usage of thing will go up
  • People are using our new features to do with thing
  • [balancing metric]

Can you see the problem? If usage goes up, what else would you be doing to drive that other than the features you’re building? And of course you’ll be instrumenting the features anyway. So KR1 and 2 are isomorphic in practice. I nearly let it go, because I didn’t want to move goalposts – but then I remembered OKRs are a mindset. They exist to help you make choices about what to build and what not to build. The team needed a different guiding principle – and I didn’t know exactly what it was, but it needed them to think more deeply about why they were doing this work. What was “more usage of thing” a proxy for – to users and the organisation? Is it “more efficent goal-seeking” or “I’ll come back and do this again” or “more revenue” or what?

I saw them again at the squad’s first checkin after they’d been presented last week, and reluctantly decided not to sit on my hands. I’m glad I got to talk to the whole squad about my thinking – so designers and technologists and researchers and performance analysts got to hear the dilemma first-hand. I’m hoping they get to think about it critically and come back with something both measurable and useful.

I’ve also seen some of our other checkins get hugely better – although often the ones with the biggest improvements end up being the most poorly attended by those outside the squad, which is a huge shame. I need to work out how to encourage more people to come to these – so we can spread good practice.

Again this is all part of trying to bring things that have worked well elsewhere into the new job, but also knowing that some of the things I see genuinely are antipatterns…and where they lead.

Alongside longer-term planning, I’m also starting to talk to a few team members about building their strategic skills (and confidence in doing so). Sadly this is one of those practices where reading books really helps, but you can only truly learn by staring into the abyss – and feeling the discomfort. A lot of hand-holding is going to be needed.

I’m also starting to think about how we can make some of our ROI feel a bit more real and measurable. I’ve been thinking a lot about Josh Seiden’s fabulous “Outcomes over Outputs” where he says that businesses often confuse goals for strategy. Goals are great, but things like “get more customers” aren’t actually sufficiently tangible for teams to work on. “Retain members” is a big one for us – but is a hugely lagging metric, and driven by countless smaller behaviours and moments. I want to unpack some of these big metrics into acceptable shorter-term proxies – but where we measure the correlation on a slower basis to decide whether we want to keep them as our proxies for a future quarter.

Oh, and I’m back in the world of looking at Job Descriptions and career frameworks again. Deepjoy.

Work-adjacent stuff

Steve wrote a nice blogpost about the role of product management in reducing risk, and drew on parallels with the hunt for Osama Bin Laden. This reminded me of one of my favourite Steven Johnson books, Farsighted, which is about good decision-making. He brings together Middlemarch, Darwin’s hunt for a wife, and the Bin Laden decision into one rather lovely volume. Can’t recommend it highly enough – I’ve given away at least one copy already.

David Gerard’s “Attack of the 50ft Blockchain” blog had a great article predicting the impending collapse of the GenAI bubble – because hallucinations are becoming an ever bigger problem, and the money is starting to run out. Ed Zitron is apparently saying we’ve got about three quarters left.

Had a really good coaching session with one of my clients this Friday. Slightly bittersweet that it’s the only time I’ll get to see them this month…because their diary is rammed with them putting stuff from previous chats into action.

Real Life

Finally, I’m looking forward to a day off next Friday. I’d been hoping to do some combination of sleeping, music-making, reading…but then realised it’s the day the new Taylor Swift album comes out, so it’ll be all about that I suspect.

The knee and hip have been pretty crap for most of the week, but they’re slowly improving. I can now go upstairs in alternating steps without needing to hold on to the banister. Going downstairs is still slightly one-step-at-a-time, but I’m making definite progress. As a result I may have been a big giddy committing to these new 34″-waist jeans, but let’s see.

I’ve been trying to stay mobile regardless – heading out for walks when I can. I was delighted to see this highly-specialist sign has been reinstated just round the corner from us on Blake Hall Road. Only in Wanstead, etc.

Sign talking about who to call for cattle-related emergencies.

I finished that lovely Alistair Campbell book, and was able to track down that quote I mentioned last week about “just because you can’t fix everything, it doesn’t mean you can’t fix something”. Not Greta, but actually Helen Clark – former PM of New Zealand. Still quite inspired by that – once I can walk reliably, obvs.

V and I had to head down to Brighton another time this weekend. There were a few more things we needed to retrieve from her late mum and late stepdad’s house – including the sundial photographed on our patio on London at the top of this article. We bought it for them when they got married, and it was a great place to gather in their garden, and rest a glass of wine.

Of course, moving a sundial from one place to another is a fairly pointless activity. It’s going to be oriented wrong for our garden. The analemma that helps you correct for the orientation of the earth will be a bit out – because it’s location-specific. But we’d still rather have it than not.

And retrieving it was a great excuse for a pub lunch in one of our favourite locations.

I’m trying not to think too much about the state of our lawn, which appears to be 90% moss and dandelions at the moment. Hopefully I can intervene before things run too badly amok – although it’s going to take quite a lot of kneeling to deal with the weeds, and that’s not something I’m sure I’m ready for just yet.

An overgrown lawn.
Perhaps I can get Finn the cat to help me.

I also had one of those parent-related disasters that only occur when you’re being cocky about something you once used to understand…and get your children to misspend quite large sums of pocket money on unusable technology. So I now own an extra 2TB hard disk that I can’t use, and have quietly bought all the cables and mounting parts, plus a replacement disk that’s THE RIGHT BLOODY SIZE FOR MOUNTING IN THESE MODERN DESKTOP COMPUTERS, and we shall speak no more of it. But no music-gear or theatre splurging for me as a result.

Onward to next week. By the time I’m next typing this, I’ll be able to gush about Tortured Poets…hopefully.

Weeksnote – 6th April – Messy Progress

Muddy trainers and very muddy legs
Definitely wishing I’d worn the trail shoes instead. And trail legs.

After the sheepish eventual Threeknote a fortnight ago, I was determined to get back into a regular weekly cadence, but no such luck. I’d imagined the Easter weekend as a beacon of serenity where I’d read books, drink fine wine, create music, and pontificate gently. Instead I spent quite a lot of it either at sundry retail parks, in the car to said retail parks, or trying to wrest a truly enormous chicken from The Ginger Pig into submission. There was also a ton of work hangover stuff to get through, and so I wanted to make the most of time away from the computer. So two weeks-worth in one go it is.

This weekend similarly had potential to be jampacked with indulgence and creativity (I continue to live in hope), as the girls are away on a pampering trip to West Sussex for two nights, leaving me and the secondborn to tragically subsist on bacon and pizza. Unfortunately this morning I did something stupid to my right hip and knee at a very skiddy Parkrun, so I’m back in bed and about 90% ibuprofen. So weeknotes it is, in the hope I’m feeling better and more inspired later.

Enough backstory, Tom, how have work things been?

The squads have been getting their OKRs ready for Q4 – all tied back to business-level OKRs about things like member retention or simplification. I can’t deny that this was a pretty painful process last time, with there being a few weeks of review and discussion while we got things pinned down to a standard I was comfortable with, and this lasted well into the quarter. However, those difficult conversations (and the processes we put in place) have proved to be really valuable, as the proposals from the squads this time round were miles better than last time. Our CPTO described it as “a step change”, which is rather lovely.

We worked the other way round this time too, with folks creating things in a fairly structured googledoc covering:

  • The OKRs
  • The context and thinking around why you’ve chosen this, rather than something else – including user insight/metrics/financial analysis that lead to a value proposition
  • Any initiatives you’ve already got in mind for it
  • What data you’re going to need
  • Dependencies/collaboration with other squads
  • Key wins/learning from the work in the last quarter
  • What discovery you’re going to do this quarter to help improve your plans for next quarter

Work in this document started just over a fortnight ago, although it was often bringing together long-standing threads of conversation. There was lots of comment-wrangling as we all worked everything through, but that worked out ok as not everybody was ready at the same time so the document never got too horribly noisy.

The presentations this week were then a summary of what had gone into these decks. And most of them – I’m pretty happy to say – are good to go. There are a few underpinning workstreams where we’re struggling to find the right way to frame OKRs – our design system and our engineering experience squads are necessarily a bit “meta”…but it’s hard not to get caught up in jargon that makes the work sound like navelgazing. How do you explain the business value of improving Mean Time To Recovery without saying “look, please read ‘Accelerate’ and trust us”.

One of the other things that’s good about this improved maturity is that we’ve also already got our finance and analytics colleagues looking through the proposed work before it’s been presented outside our directorate…so we should be on a front foot around ROI and decent measures too.

Plus we’re getting clarity on how much squad capacity goes onto BAU, better visibility on patching and maintenance work, and that hopefully helps give leadership more understanding of where all the money is going, and a feeling of control.

I’m also really glad we’ve started talking about plans for the following quarter already as well – this is all part of getting a more evidence-informed roadmap that gets more certain over time. I’m planning to set aside a fortnight in early June where checkings can give an update on what they’ve found, so we can adapt as needed before committing too early to any large bits of work.

When I first joined, one of the LPMs led the session – but this was probably my first Big Meeting that I was running. Which meant I was also on the hook for some of our “high performance practices” – some of which take me a long way out of my comfort zone. Every meeting is supposed to start with a clear declaration of intent, and then there’s a section called “voice in the room” – basically an icebreaker to invite a range of people to speak up and make the session feel more like a group effort. Finally (in the rare occasion when meetings don’t run to the absolute wire) we do a “what was useful, what would make it more useful”.

“Voice in the room” always gives me a lot of worry, because I don’t want to just pick something trivial. All my interactive media/storytelling background kicks in, so I want to take people on a bit of a journey – make it something that feels a bit resonant and relevant. Where people fell like they’ve learned something. And that’s a lot of pressure to put on myself, and a lot to ask of my fading gameshow-format skillz. Plus we were doing the OKRs review across two sessions, so I needed MORE THAN ONE of these damn things.

In the end I went with “how long do you make your Easter Eggs last” for the first one, producing much disbelief from many about the people who can keep them going for over a month. The second was a light pun on OKRs, but I warned people about it, because I wanted to give them time to think: “what’s the most interesting or memorable key you have in your possession”. This produced some truly fascinating examples of people who still had one key from fascinating buildings they’d previously worked in (and should have given back about a decade ago), fond memories of first cars, and even devices that looked like keys but were actually something else.

I brought out this:

A single white key from a synthesiser keyboard

This is the low D from a Korg Wavestation EX, generously donated to me by one Robin Beanland, and which was part of my live rig when I was playing with the reformed Dubious Brothers. The synth itself didn’t need to produce any sound – it was just one of many things driving Mainstage. So in any given song it could have been a trumpet, a sound effect, a synth, a harp – sometimes even different things at different points. But it clearly took quite a battering, because on the morning of the gig – during my final run-through – the damn thing suddenly failed. It stopped springing back. There it was, just a low D, always on – and impossible to retrigger without lifting the key up by hand.

So, on the morning of this massive gig, playing at the Bush Hall in front of 3-400 people – I was trying to take apart a synth keyboard to find out why on earth it had failed and see if I could repair it…then checking every other key just in case too. All while Vicky started looking at which music shops were within driving distance if we needed to very suddenly buy a replacement.

A diversion, but that was my story on the day. It brought everyone together very nicely. Even if it meant I had to disassemble and reassemble a slightly elderly 90s synth for the sake of a 45 second gag.

A synthesiser in pieces.
Thankfully I did remember where all the screws went, and it’s now safely reinstalled.

Oh, and you can see me successfully playing a working Wavestation that very evening here:

Look it all made sense in the late 80s/early 90s – everyone’s just a lot older now.
DVDs are available. If anyone still has a way to play DVDs.

Where were we? Oh yes, work stuff.

Watched some actual users at last. Hurrah. As fascinating as ever, and I need to make more time for this.

I ran a product community session where we talked about ROI, and some of my heuristics for it. I always worry people overthink this, aiming for an accurate answer rather than one that is ‘good enough to compare’, so it was nice to give folks some stuff to think about. The gang then did a Troika Consulting round (yet another great Liberating Structures workshop format) – helping each other get fresh perspectives on their problems. This even worked pretty well remotely, with participants turning off their cameras while their issues were being discussed, as a proxy for turning their backs.

People seemed to think it was useful, so that was good. Next stop Opportunity Solution Trees, and I’m also starting to think about doing a Product Learning awayday one Tuesday in May or June.

Otherwise, I’ve realised it’s time to take a bit of time off for myself. I’ve got a lot of reading and thinking I want to do – and as a contractor I only get to do some of that in “office time”. It’s been a very full-on first three months, and it’s time to recharge the batteries: the people and the processes and short-term plans are starting to take shape, but where do I want us to be going?

Wider Producting

I joined Scott’s “Product Leaders for Good” remote meetup mid-week. Very odd being back on Microsoft Teams, I’m not sure I liked it. But it WAS lovely to see a bunch of old familiar faces and finally get to see what a bunch of other names I know from Twitter/Mailgroups actually look like. I felt like a bit of an outsider as I’m not really working with either local or central government, but they do want my continued help on the government product career framework. There’s a date in the diary for a long workshop on that in May, so I’m glad to see it’s still likely to go somewhere.

Given everything else that was going on, I was delighted that I didn’t also have to worry about the Mind the Product “Product Leadership” training – which was being expertly handled by Bea and others. Apparently my name was dropped a few times, some of my stories were re-told, and I’m somehow comparatively famous in certain niche corners of Nova Scotia!

Had some nice WhatsApp chats with a former GDS colleague who was agonising about a thorny stakeholder/business-context problem, and seemed to make things better. That was nice.

I’ve had a very flattering invitation, which I’m still getting my head around – more news on that soon, once my impostor syndrome has been given a stern talking to.

I also got to join a bitter-sweet gathering of a whole host of really lovely product luminaries – Dave, Bruce, Jock, Martina, Nam, Christian and more – all there to grab a few beers with the lovely Janna Bastow and James Mayes for the last time in 9 months. As anyone who’s been following James on LinkedIn, or pretty much any other social media, will know – he recently had surgery to remove a brain tumour. This was 90% successful, but he needs radio- and chemo-therapy to blast the last 10%, and is going to be pretty immunocompromised as a result. So this was their last trip to London for a while. But a total delight to see them both.

Janna Bastow and Tom Dolan
I think I’m slowly acquiring my dad’s habit of not being able to have a normal face in photos.
This involuntary larking around needs to stop, sharpish.

Janna and I talked about managing curly hair (she’s only recently surrendered to this) and tons of other IRL stuff, but also about roadmapping and quarterly cycles. I was fascinated (and rather validated) to hear that rather than extending their quarters to get more done, they’re actually shortening their cycles to review and adapt roadmaps faster. “If it hurts, do it more often”, as the devops saying goes. ProdPad are now working on 7 week cycles, with 6 weeks of build and 1 week of tidy-up/review. Sadly there wasn’t tons of time to ask about this more, but this was a very welcome thing to hear.

Real Life

I had to dash off from seeing these lovely product-folk to go and see Pye Corner Audio in Hackney Wick, with gigbuddy Steve. There was a very silly opening act called Kylie Monologue, which was just good electropop fun. The proper support was a modular artist called Polypores, who I’ve never been convinced by. He was clearly having fun, and there were some interesting sounds that changed over time, but it never really had any sense of form or composition. It’s the thing that stops me releasing any of my modular jams – I had fun creating them, but would anyone want to listen to them? Polypores has a prodigious output…and maybe needs to up the quality control. They seem like a nice person and everything, but I’m just not sure it was strictly music.

A man standing over synthesisers and sequencers in a nightclub

Pye Corner Audio, however, was definitely music. Some truly great tunes played that got the venerable crowd jigging along. He describes it as “John Carpenter meets Drexcya” which sums it up pretty well – there’s an 80s radiophonic vibe to a lot of it all, but also bloody huge and bold drums and basslines. He’s also doing some great stuff with Andy Bell, formerly of Ride on his latest album “Let’s Emerge” – and is the inspiration for some of the Ableton-trading between me and guitarist chum Pete. Anyway, the core ‘hauntology’ genre sounds a bit like this…

I briefly looked up the price of some of the Elektron gear he was using on stage, as I was sorely tempted, but thankfully it was too much for an impulse purchase. However, in consolation, I’m about to take temporary ownership of a bunch of surplus Eurorack modules from old musical chum Jem G, so I will have plenty of other stuff to keep tinkering with.

Jane Weaver’s new album “Love in Constant Spectacle” arrived in the post today (and on Bandcamp yesterday). I’m not 100% sure about the move towards more of a guitary spacerock sound. It’s clearly the album she wanted to make, but I’m missing the synths at the core of the songwriting. Maybe her wonderful “Fenella” projects are what scratches that particular itch now, and she wants to do something different. The title track is still wonderful though. In the meantime I’ll continue to admire the drumming and synthwork on her classic “The Architect”

Piano-wise, I’ve been starting some new pieces. The slow grind of learning. Gah. They’re lovely though, and I’m making some good progress. I’m particularly fond of Grieg’s “Arietta” from the lyric pieces collection. But, looking at the specific notation used, I’m wondering what precisely he was thinking about, when deciding to write this piece about her?

some suggestive pairs of "pause" marks on music manuscript

19th-century musical smut aside, what else has been going on?

The retail bit of last weekend led to me finally biting an unexpected bullet. As some folks will have observed, I pretty much only wear Levi 501s, until they wear out. For just over a decade these were 36″ waist, 34″ leg. But post-lockdown (and getting inspired to get a bit fitter) I’ve found I can now get into my old fancy Diesel 34″ jeans, and those 36″ waists definitely need a belt now, and are bunching up a bit. Which is a bit scratchy. So I’ve committed – the new jeans are 34″ waist, and I have to stay able to get into them.

This also drove the determination to get out to Parkrun today. Despite the stupid knee/hip injury, the 5K went pretty well and was a good change from trudging around the local streets on my own without any pace-setters. I must confessed I slightly overcooked the first km, thinking I could magically keep up with 26-minute people after such a long break, and really paid for it later – but glad I went along. The sub-25s will be back soon, I’m pretty sure.

On the book front, I’ve nearly finished Alistair Campbell’s “But What Can I Do – how politics has gone so wrong and what you can do to fix it” and I’m feeling pretty inspired to get out there and make some things happen. In my mythical spare time, obviously. Regardless, this is great progress. Being inside government for a long time, and not being able to speak about your own wishes and dreams, can numb you to certain things. I think I’d become a bit resigned and disengaged with the world, thinking that all I could do was try and fix the stuff I could get near from within. But I’m starting to remember it’s possible to imagine bigger and better.

He has a lovely quote that’s stuck with me – I think it was a Greta Thunberg, but I’m struggling to find the specific source as I thumb through it again, which I’ll leave you with now, while I test my hip and knee – by going downstairs and attempting to put a neighbour’s chickens to bed:

“Just because you can’t fix everything, it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try to fix something.”

Amen to that.

Threeknote – 24th March 2024 – Juggling

A paper sign showing Daisy as a baby on Dick'n'Dom
We’ll get to this later

Hello there. Gosh, it’s been a while, hasn’t it? For me, as well as any passing folks that might read this nonsense. Sadly I’ve been suffering from what one might call “an abundance of Real Life” over the last few weeks, and so the 60-90 minutes it takes to pull one of these together has repeatedly been squished out of my weekends and evenings. Hence only getting to this now.

It’s not done me much good either – lots of ideas have stayed feeling really half-formed in my head as a result of not writing the weeks up. There’s a whole host of stuff swirling around, and this ritual’s always helped me shape things – even the points I then decide not to include in a public blogpost. But this also means that, right now, I’ve got no idea if this post is going to be vast as I plough through everything in my head, or super high-level as I’ve forgotten tons of what’s been going on.

(Incidentally, I’d always ascribed the idea of “I don’t know what I think about something until I write it down” to Marina Hyde, but it turns out the quote was from Joan Didion. Marina’s jokes are probably better, though.)

Let’s start with the work stuff, as is traditional, before we get into “the random stuff that would have been on Twitter, back in the days when it wasn’t a hellhole”.

Three Weeks in Product Leading

Last time I posted, I’d only just found out that loads of my old work on the government product capability framework was still ticking along, and so I was inspired to join Scott’s Whatsapp group of Product Leaders for Good after all – to provide tea and sympathy for old public sector chums, but also to be part of the nudging.

There were a ton of familiar faces in there, of course – but it was also a lovely chance to reconnect with folks who’d dropped off the radar over the past ten-ish years, and to see some ‘mutual orbit’ people I’d never previously spoken to. The groups has quietened down a little bit after the initial flurry of hellos, but we’re looking forward to our first collective lunchtime chat after Easter…even if it’s on Teams – ugh.

We’re sharing useful resources in a group, so I’ve finally added another key point to my “Roadmap heuristics – a work in progress” blogpost: be disciplined about what goes into ‘Later’. It’s an overdue amendment that’s been making me feel guilty for ages, so it’s super-handy to have a catalyst for getting the words out of my head.

About a fortnight ago I went out for a lovely evening in Soho with Randy Silver, Jason Knight, Jock, Keji, Kirk-who-was-over-from-the-US and many more. We were even joined at the start by most of the original “Mind the Product” folks too – Martin, Emily, Chris. It was wonderful to catch up with so many delightful and wise people – comparing perspectives, patting each other on the back about the continued ‘hard yards’ of proper digital transformation, and alternately celebrating/moaning about our various neurodiversities. I left before things got too messy, and thankfully there’s no photographic evidence. But I did manage to get Martin Eriksson to say that he’d come and chat to the product community at my new job – which was very kind of him.

Back at work, I’ve been lightly trying to make our various product ceremonies a little bit more valuable to the community members. We have a weekly ‘standup’ meeting on Mondays, and I’m trying to bring in a bit more structure to the conversation – not to push out the social side, but to make sure folks don’t miss dependencies and we’re celebrating the right things. Basically I want the session to have enough of a point that other things won’t get scheduled over the top of it.

People who’ve worked with me over the years will remember classics such as:

  • What have you learned that everyone else needs to know?
  • What help do you need?
  • What metrics have you moved?
  • etc

The first refreshed one of these seemed to go pretty well, and it led to some interesting new discussion – and a few things being celebrated that would have fallen through the net with the previous structure. Let’s see if it sticks – not because of me demanding it, but because the team members keep iterating it to make it even more valuable.

I also ran an hour-long workshop with the wider product community about what they *need* the community to do for them. I sent out a pretty long questionnaire beforehand – asking about everything from skills to trust to context – and we went through the high level findings from that as a group. I found it a hugely useful session, because it helped me think about a roadmap for what the community can do for each other, what I can do for them (in particular around creating more space to play), and what help I can potentially bring in from the outside. I think it may have given folks a bit of hope that I’m here to help, not just to endlessly say “these OKRs aren’t quite good enough yet, have you thought about thinking about [yet another new lens]”.

(I do feel a bit bad that it took me two months to get round to doing this particular session, but I baaaaadly needed to breathe out after putting so much emotional energy into getting the GDS Product Community up and running. I’d have also just been going through the motions, and not had any working hypotheses about where W? was different.)

I’ve been getting further into the “governance operations” side of things too. How do we set things up so that squads have the context to make sensible decisions at the micro level – but we have enough visibility that the right work is being done at a more general level, and there are no unhealthy pressures for squads to absorb. There’s been a bit of talk about how honest we are about “30% time” – the proportion of our capacity set aside for non-OKR-driven maintenance, patching etc…and whether it’s enough. So I’ve been drawing charts like this for folks:

I’ve also been talking about the strategic process of creating “hypothetical budgets”, and using team confidence scores to iterate and get more confidence in longer-term plans. I’ve realised this might be slightly-new-thinking, now I’m in a new world, so I think it is going to end up as the first standalone blogpost in ages. As and when I finish it – ha.

I’ve been in some more really interesting strategy workshops, thinking about where the organisation might be in 2030.

I got to spend 40 minutes with Jon Moore of SVPG, who we’re lucky enough to have on our board, talking through what I was seeing/thinking/worrying about. He gave me a few really interesting perspectives from his own experience, a few areas of kind-but-definitely-clear challenge, and a ton of energy and backing. Really looking forward to the next one of these chats.

We’ve also started the process of getting our next quarter’s OKRs going, and I’m seeing some really good approaches coming in already from the first teams to put their heads above the parapet. Of course, being me, there’s now a ton of “yes and…” in the documents – even down to sharing potential visualisations that would make progress easier for our stakeholders to understand.

Our colleagues from Finance also want to get more involved this quarter – trying to get a better handle of modelling ROI for each aspect our planned work. This is probably going to lead to a few difficult questions about how we prove and bank success – but I think they’re actually incredibly useful conversations to have. It’s chipping away at improving the context for the teams and empowering them – how do we get them connected to metrics we can genuinely measure and that are genuinely valuable. Alternatively, if we can’t, can senior people please commit to some proxies for them? As Josh Seiden would say “what are the specific changes in user behaviour that we think are going to drive business results”? Some of this is going to be on me, of course, but it’s worthwhile work.

Of course these conversations are always happening at different levels, because my role is to look at OKR-setting and reporting as part of a system. How can we create a context for the teams where they’ve got meaningful measures, that can be reported on sufficiently frequently that they know what’s working? And how can squads know what the longer-term things are that matter, so they can make plans to continually improve towards these – rather than have completely new objectives each quarter. This has also tied into to discussions about how we do our own business planning and organisational roadmapping around organisational OKRs.

When I write all this down, no wonder I’m feeling Just A Bit Tired At Times.

But my biggest victory of the last three weeks was that I managed to get agreement that we were going to stop working on something.

I’m really glad we’re freeing up a squad to start working on something more valuable – and that we got to a sensible evidence-based decision about it, rather than ploughing on by default. Saying “no” is not something anyone likes to do, but I hope leadership (including me) managed to do it kindly for everyone.

Product Miscellany

  • John Cutler wrote a nice piece on “the power of first-hand experience”. I often talk about becoming an agilist/product manager because I was fed up with projects running late, or with fairly-flawlessly-executing projects that it turns out nobody needed, so it’s nice to have a list of “why we all do this” in one place.
  • Scott Colfer writing up his experience of using the WhatsApp Community thing. Full disclosure: I was one of the people moaning about things not working. Sorry Scott.
  • Stephen McCarthy, my design counterpart, talks about the power of learning by breaking things – even the things you love.
  • Good coaching-client session last Friday morning. Nothing I can share from that yet. But apparently I helped. That’s nice.
  • Bought a whole bunch of new books: Marty et al’s new “Transformed”, of course. But also (finally) Alison Coward’s “Workshop Culture”. And at least one other that’s slipped my mind.
  • Please don’t ask me how many books I’ve finished, kthxbai.

Real Life

Yes, finally, it’s “the stuff that would have been posts on Twitter”.

Did a quick sprint up to Norwich the weekend before last – which turned out to take waaaaaay longer than originally planned as the M11 was closed. But, as a result of the diversion, I did get to see that Broxbourne Zoo (from my childhood), which was later rebranded Paradise Wildlife Park, is now called Hertfordshire Zoo. I think something terrible happened there a few years ago, but it’s odd to see that tragedy manifesting itself years later in a shiny new road sign.

Road sign in Cheshunt saying "Hertfordshire Zoo".
Yes, the car was very stationary at this point in time.

I got there eventually, took the daughter out to the supermarket and Wagamamas, before dropping her back at university to watch a play featuring her friends. On the way back to the car, even though it was nighttime, I still got to see the UEA rabbits. Awwww, etc.

Three rabbits, lit by streetlight.
Boing!

Daisy also had a weird loop-closing experience. At her final club-night of the term, the special guests were former kids TV superstars Dick’n’Dom, who came on stage at 12:30pm to play hardcore drum’n’bass. Yes really.

Anyway, she brought a poster with her, featuring the last time she met the two of them – in “the baby race” nineteen years ago. That’s it at the very top of this post. Dick’n’Dom were very excited to see it, and waved it around to the whole crowd – even having it on the front of their DJ booth for a chunk of the set. But Daisy also spotted there was a certain grim realisation from the pair of them – that the baby race was now sufficiently long ago that even the babies are now adults at university.

Her poster was somehow retrieved in the crush of the crowd, and will now be ornately framed in her student house. A fitting end.

One of the curses of working at Which? is that you meet interesting people who are experts on {all sorts of things}. And you get chatting to them, and realise that perhaps it’s really really time you replaced your own {very old one of those things}. So thanks to the lovely Lisa who runs our mattress testing unit, Vicky and I are now considerably poorer but sleeping tons better.

The mattress turned up from Emma INSANELY vacuum packed, and a very strong man carried it all the way up into our loft room.

a mattress curled up in a spiral, inside a suprisingly tiny box.
The box is 18″ per side, and as tall as a single bed is wide.

You get this snail-like monster out of the box, unfold it, roll it out flat, carefully clear everything nearby out of the way, then cut the plastic on the side to let the air in. Within fifteen minutes it looked like this:

a nearly-expanded king sized mattress, now sitting on a bed perfectly normally.

It was pretty good that night, and continued to get better and better over the next week. Loads of my back and neck problems are already improving, and I’m sleeping for longer – while overheating less. Also, I can move in the night without waking up Vicky. Can’t recommend highly enough, and wish we’d changed it over earlier.

The Amaryllis continued to be glorious, and is now fading fast. Pah.

Large red flowers on an Amaryllis plant in full bloom.
One half of the amaryllis flowers now look terrible, and the other half is starting to get a bit shrivelled too.

Elsewhere in ‘Nature Corner’, we had two ducks briefly move into our garden pond. The cats were absolutely fascinated – and sensibly realised that they’d almost certainly lose the fight if they started anything. And get sodden in the process.

Two ducks by a pond.
A cat looking sadly out of his catflap
Finn watches ‘frustrating tv’.
Another cat that's really not going to have any luck, sitting by the pond, watching ducks.
Loki wouldn’t have much luck either, great chonk that he is.

What else?

  • Dear God, the Westfield parking app is terrible
  • I love this picture of an Owl who’s Just Had Enough
  • One evening, I spotted this lovely cute frog nestling in one of the holes in the plastic grid that runs down the lawn to the studio…and when getting ready to upload realised it was a wee bit ruder than I first thought.
  • I’ve been wondering: if ghosts have problems interacting with the physical world, how can they hear?

Music Bits

Upgraded to Ableton Live 12. Ran out of disk space to install any extra packs – but then I probably don’t need any more string/brass libraries on top of the Native Instruments ones.

Inspired by some of the GLOK/Pye Corner Audio stuff I’ve been listening to, featuring Ride’s Andy Bell, I’ve started trading Ableton sets with former GDS TechArch partner-in-crime Pete Chamberlin. He’s a mean guitarist, as folks who came to my 50th birthday party will know, and has shared a few little noodles for me to add things to. I’ve sent him the stems of one of my stagnating works-in-progress. But he’s also come up with an interesting constraint:

Neither of us is allowed to add more than two things, or work on a piece for more than two hours without sending it back to the other.

This is a fascinating idea, and much more like a jam. We have to keep bouncing things off each other, to see where it goes next.

I’m making good progress on lots of the piano pieces – getting much deeper into Kabalesky’s miniature “Novelette”, for example. I’m starting to look at some Grieg pieces that were suggested to me by Adam at work, and there’s even some (easier) Liszt on the horizon. But occasionally the old Rock habits kick in:

music manuscript

This particular stretch of Skempton’s “Well well, Cornelius” keeps turning into “Slipping Through My Fingers” and requires constant vigilance. Dammit.

Two years ago, I absolutely loved the Rachel K Collier online course where she taught us/Mary Spender how to use Ableton Live – I picked up so much inspiration from that – so I’ve also succumbed to the early bird discount on the pair’s songwriting course. I just need TIME, now, of course.

Still waiting for the new Jane Weaver album to come out – this profile was nice in the meantime. Otherwise I haven’t bought that much more music to listen to – instead I’ve been delving into the archives a lot. I’d forgotten what a brilliant, but deeply unusual, album Self Esteem’s “Prioritise Pleasure” is – after playing it to death in early 2022. I’m also rediscovering Daphne & Celeste, Ulrich Schnauss and falling in love with “This Woman’s Work” all over again. Plus I had a pretty good run while rediscovering Everything but the Girl’s “Walking Wounded” – which remains as heartbreakingly poignant as ever.

That’ll do for now. See you in definitely-just-a-week’s-time.

Weeknote 3rd March – Readiness

A heron, perched on the ridge of a roof
This bastard’s got an eye on my goldfish.

It’s been quite a week.

On Tuesday I had to present a mid-quarter OKRs update to the Which? leadership team. It was a very different meeting to the type I’m used to from the civil service, as a) everyone had read the slides beforehand and b) it wasn’t a discussion about the numbers per se (and my failings as a human being for letting it get that way), but about culture and how we could better enable teams to focus and succeed. I was hugely glad I’d done all the preparation for the meeting I feared, but I was delighted with the much more useful and important conversation. We talked lots about long-term planning, and how we make space for strategic discovery (or ‘obvious’ improvements that somehow never happen) alongside the day-to-day. Apparently I did OK, too, so that’s nice.

On Thursday, in among team checkins, I spent a grand total of 2.5h with our CEO – of which 1.5 was just the pair of us. We talked about all sorts, including how we might come up with ways to instrument our digital products to help us measure ‘trust’. I got to wheel out Larry Macherrone’s trust formula, of course. I think we inspired each other in equal measure – although I’m worried about what I may have accidentally voluntered myself into making happen because I got enthusiastic. And at the end of the day, loads of the product folk went to the pub – which was just lovely.

We’ve had an absolute ton of candidates for our Delivery Manager/Agile Coach role – and I’ve had to learn all the new recruitment processes around that (although I remain very grateful to a colleague for taking on the bulk of the sift). I think I’ve also identified a GSuite setting that will make everyone’s lives easier when it comes to recruitment workflow…but let’s see if that can be turned on in practice.

I keep having lovely chats with our head of PMO as well, who seems eminently sensible and pragmatic. We’re talking about how to improve the agility of traditional projects, but also how to build the planning skills and governance around agile working – not to constrain teams, but to empower and protect them. An unexpected but fabulous alliance.

The other big event was that I took Wednesday off from the day job, recalibrated my brain, and went to help an old government friend think about their product teams and organisational forces. Loads of good discussion about what makes good product management/managers, irrespective of the working context. I also helped with moderating a few of their staff’s capability assessments, which was fascinating. The work may be so different, but you can still spot the people trying to do the right thing the right way a mile off – even if it’s just early potential.

One of the other strange discoveries from that day was that my mic-drop work on the government product capability framework is still alive. Not only are people trying to continue the work to get it adopted formally, some people are already using the documents I created as the “target state”. I was genuinely quite touched. I now find myself in contact with senior people in CDDO on the subject. Even though I’m no longer part of government.

The upshot of this is that, contrary to last week’s glum worries about whether government needed a break from me, there are folks that actively want me to carry on taking up space there – so I’m going to do that. Well, as much as I can alongside the day-job and while not being paid for it, of course. Strange to find out that a personal-passion project, which GDS wasn’t that fussed about and I dashed out in my last few days, may turn out to be the most important thing I did while I worked there.

As a result of all this, I ended the week with an inbox that was something of an absolute car-crash. I’m still trying to recover some sense of sanity from it all – none of my cleverly-constructed filters can save me now.

On Friday morning I also closed a window with about 40-odd tabs when I needed to reboot the mac, and then (while looking at said inbox) let the tab group scroll off my browser history before I could do “restore all”. Erk. Hopefully anything critical will come back with decent warning, rather than as a nasty surprise. But I suspect I am starting to get enough of a sense of the bigger problems that I now know which documents I’ve seen – and I could probably get them back if needed.

I’ve also started to spot some underlying trends with the products – things I’ve noticed are broken and where we’ve possibly been misreading signals in the user feedback, but also areas I think are likely to be strategically important which I’m not sure others have yet fully seen. And, as ever, I’m trying to get more specific and empirical about “better” – because we’ve only got the capacity to work on some of our ideas, which means ensuring we’ve got the insight needed to choose between a whole bunch of things that are individually half-decent opportunities.

Miscellaneous work-ish bits

  • Really enjoyed joining my first “Product Coaches in the Aether” remote meetup on Monday (thanks Randy!) where I got to see some familiar faces like Adrian and Christopher and Spencer…but also a whole host of new folks, some of whom I have only seen as name going through my feed over the last few years – a litany of friends-of-friends. I didn’t say tons, but really enjoyed hearing about the problems they were going through, and the wisdom they had to overcome some of them.
  • Anais back at DBT published a blogpost about the service owner role, which I found a bit of a hard read – as I was definitely around for some of the roller-coaster phase she mentions. With the right people in those roles, I think there can be hugely successful enabling partnership between service owner and product manager – where the service owner worries about the business context and enabling change, alongside the product person thinking about what to be built to get the right outcomes in ways users will love. I’ve had lots of great Service Owner relationships where we were a really strong partnership working together. They’ve sometimes been the person who can see political landscape I can’t; I’ve sometimes been critical in helping change policy mindsets to gently embrace fallibility. But there is a deep and powerful gravity well around it becoming an “account director” role, where product teams do just become a delivery function for a solution that’s already been decided, and business context is hoarded to leave folks delivering what the business wants as feature teams. If I was to rewrite *that* framework, I’d put in some very strong guardrails against it. But, in the meantime, I wish everyone well.
  • Loved this satirical take on the downsizing going on in certain areas of the industry at the moment, again thanks to Randy. Please keep on going to the final paragraph – we’ve all been there.
  • Pivotal Labs’ practices – an internal staff manual, republished to the outside world, now the inside doesn’t really exist (I think via Stephen). Some workshop formats you’ll know, detailed instruction manuals for those you don’t. But a great toolkit to delve into – it’s going to stay in the bookmarks bar for a good while.
  • Caught up with Chris who I know from “Product in the Aether” lean coffee events, for a good chat about the pros and cons of different industries. I’ve left government, Chris is settling into it. We talked a lot about finding and celebrating the people who are allowed to be uncertain, and helping spread the stories of success that come from it.

Real Life

Piano’s been going really well. Had a lesson where Seb looked over some fingering I’d come up with on Howard Skempton’s “Well, well, Cornelius” and basically said “yeah, that’s fine”. Apparently the Schumann piece is miles better than last week – which I couldn’t hear personally, but I’ll take it.

Managed to make it out for a run this morning. Currently averaging once per month, thanks to the new work regime, rather than the intended 1-2 per week and the occasional 10k. Clearly it’s going to take a while to get back to the sub-24-minute 5k runs, but at least I’ve started doing something again. And I was still a fair bit quicker than the depressing run I had on 3rd Feb. I should probably bit the bullet and start getting up early enough on Saturday that I can make it to Parkrun. Sigh.

It looks like my favourite filter module ‘Three Sisters’ is going to be in stock again soon. I don’t need another one, but I do use the one I’ve got on almost everything, If you are a modular person you should totally sign up for the waiting list. Not cheap, but worth every penny.

Oh, and I got paid, so we have cracked and finally ordered a new ‘Emma’ mattress. We laid on lots of different variants, but there was one which just kept making me nearly fall asleep because it was so comfortable. Sadly got to wait 4-6 weeks for it to turn up, and so every night will now be like “The Princess and the Pea”.

Given the recent vast influx of wine to the house, I decided I could probably afford to pass on 2022 Rhone in-bond.

Have been thoroughly enjoying discovering ‘Pye Corner Audio‘ and the whole “hauntology’ music scene, but through them I discovered the wonderful work that Andy Bell (guitarist of Ride) has been up to in the electronica space – through collaborations and also his own work as ‘GLOK’. The latter has inspired me and guitarist-friend Pete to start doing something similar of our own, which is rather lovely.

Nature Corner

Where I live in Wanstead is based around the ornamental waters of an old palladian mansion (whose portico inspired The White House, and much else) so we get a lot of bird life. It’s always rather special to have the local herons come by – even if they’re just after the contents of your pond. One was perched on top of the neighbour’s roof for nearly half an hour. They’re so curiously alien – you can see the dinosaur lurking – but also very beautiful and elegant. Picture at the top of this post.

And of course, you’re all waiting for the latest in “suggestive Amaryllis” photos, aren’t you?

An amaryllis bud, just starting to open, with a few dark red petals showing.

Have a good week, all!

Belated Weeknote – 25th Feb-ish – Overcoming Light Harumph

The top of an amaryllis bulb, with a new flower bud just starting to peek out from the old brown leaves.
Amaryllis two is on the way.

This has been in draft for the last few days, and I’ve just not had time to wrap it up until now. Low on work stuff, heavy on many flavours of ‘everything else’. LinkedIn folks seeking Hot Product Takes: you may want to skip this one. Be reassured that things picked up a bit from Monday, but that’s for a different weeknote!

It’s been a bit of an odd week. I was still not remotely myself after the visit to the now-empty house in Saltdean last weekend, and ended up taking Monday off at the last minute. I just wasn’t in the zone for doing sensible work, or anything else really. Spent the day pottering, staring, and eventually having a bit of a vocal jam with myself in Ableton…that the world really doesn’t need to hear.

I ended up slightly on a back foot for the rest of the week as a result. It wasn’t helped that on Tuesday I had 11 30-minute meetings – argh. I briefly broke the 100-browser-tabs milestone on Thursday, but managed to get down to a single window open by Friday. With a lot of tabs still, but at least you could count them. Hopefully I didn’t close anything too crucial en route. After a certain point, Miro boards start to look pretty similar, and you lose track of whether this is the last or second-last of the duplicate tabs for the same document. (I must admit this is one of the VERY few things I miss about office – there were different contexts for different types of documents, rather than just an unstructured soup of stuff in the browser – but it’s not enough to convince me to go back.)

I’ve started to get involved in some of next year’s business planning processes. Not as a recipient, but as a process-creator, which is rather exciting. Which? works on a very iterative planning approach with a few year-long organisational OKRs, which help shape some aspects of the teams work – it’s how they set their quarterly product OKRs. There’s loads of good stuff already in place, but I’m looking for a) how we can bring in the bottom-up alongside the top-down, b) how we can do more/better choosing-between, c) how we can make space for continous improvement without it being an unaccountable blank cheque.

I got a chance to share this wonderful video from the “Systemic Agility” webinar series, where the former CFO of Statoil talks about his ideas around “Beyond Budgeting”. I really really ought to get his book, and even read it, but…too many books already. Anyway, the folks I shared it with found it interesting – perhaps you will too?

Why future financial forecasting shouldn’t be run the same way as retrospective financial reporting.

All my wanging-on about amazing OKR-setting duly got put to the test, because I found out I was due to present on mid-quarter progress on Tuesday 27th (yes, you’ll have to find out how it went in the next one)…which involved having to track down loads of updates from teams/squads, many of whom were off on leave for half term.

I realised in the process that I don’t yet have a real grammar for “this is not lovely coaching advisory Tom sharing interesting stuff/perspective, this is Tom telling people He Needs a Thing to Happen” in our various comms channels. We’re mainly Slack-based, but Slack is mainly chatty for folks to catch up on in their own time. It’s easy to miss something. But if nobody really looks at email day-to-day either…

Anyway, we collectively pulled it off, but I’ve got to work out how I’m going to be clearer on that in the future. All tips welcome in comments.

You may remember my photo of the meeting-room screen with the peak-Which? booking for ‘cordless drill testing’ from a few weeks ago. This week I finally got to meet a few of the team who organise our product testing, and manage the vast reams of data created as a result, on the back of an idle corridor question while thinking about ROI: “how much does each review cost?” I probably never should have started that ball rolling.

The answer, of course, is “it depends”. But I had a lovely chat with the very delightful people who manage it, and are creating the new data architecture supporting everything. I even got to spend some time talking to the person who’s in charge of mattress testing, who has nearly 100 in her remit! (She also told me something super cool about forthcoming duvet testing, but I’m not going to spoil any social media surprises they may have lined up). It’s interesting too that one of the challenges we have is – because we will nearly-always only buy and test real stuff bought in the shops, rather than preview models – it takes us comparative ages to provide reviews. They’re thorough, but not quick. A sensible and considered, but very anti-dopamine, approach – which I find almost alien, of course.

Anyway, stresses around comms and reporting aside, it’s all been going pretty well with the day job.

Elsewhere in professional shenanigans…

Scott posted on LinkedIn that he was setting up a WhatsApp group for Product Leaders in the public sector. There were a bunch of ‘supplier’ people putting their hands up alongside the civil servants – including Scott himself – and I was briefly “yes, I can provide tea and sympathy here”. And then I had second thoughts. Yes, I’m definitely in a mode where I’m taking some time away from government, but perhaps government also needs a bit of time away from me? Perhaps me chucking in more reckons from the sidelines isn’t actually that helpful, however well-meaning? Still pondering that one.

I also ended up back in GDS-land on Thursday, saying a fond farewell to amazing Technical Architect Mateusz who’s also taking a break from Government. I’ve known Mat for about a decade now, I realise – across MOJ, DIT and GDS. He’s fab, if occasionally very fast-speaking, and if you need clever TA-ing done you should totally hire him.

Which brings me to…

Leisure/Culture Corner

Steve and I had to hotfoot our way from Mat’s leaving drinks over to Hackney Wick to go and see Craven Faults playing live. He is super-secretive about who he is (although apparently he was in a clut post-punk band in the very late 70s, and some big band in the 80s) so there were strict instructions about no photography. Which I’m interpreting as “don’t share any photos you took that actually featured him, on the internet”. Anyway, the star of the show was the instrument he performed on for over an hour…

Enormous moog modular synthesiser, covered in patch cables. A mixing desk. A reel-to-reel tape recorder.
BLOODY HELL

I dread to think how much this vast Moog modular system must have cost – and it was only one of the exotic analogue instruments being used. The fairly-portable ones that create radiophonic-style effects were whisked offstage almost immediately.

But it was an incredible performance – sedate, but still visceral and fascinating. You can hear a clip of one of the pieces he played here:

I’m still no wiser as to who he is, after an hour watching him. For a brief period I was convinced he was Graham Massey of 808 state, but I don’t think that can be true. He’s also an artist, and it turns out the “posters” you could buy at the merch stand were individually screen-printed by him for this particular event. I have number 18 out of 50!

Craven Faults concert poster - pinned out on a wooden floor
Yes, ignore how I’m holding it down, thanks.

Spent a good chunk of Friday and Saturday night watching comforting Ealing Comedies with the firstborn, to ready her for a return to university after reading week. When I last tried about four years ago, we’d not got more than 15 minutes into “Kind Hearts and Coronets”, but she totally loved it this time. Joan Greenwood is just so wonderfully wicked, and the many Alec Guinness characters are just so beautifully constructed. (Bless her, it wasn’t until afterwards she said “that actor looks really familiar” and we said “yes, Star Wars” to much facepalming).

We also watched “Man in the White Suit” as we were in a bit of a Greenwood/Guiness zone by then – and it’s actually stood up really well. Reminds me a lot of the current AI debates, and what businesses will do to avoid being disrupted. But with good jokes. Heartily recommend.

Cooking-twitter is dead, much like the rest of twitter, so sadly you only get the before and after of 2.5h of making braised cabbage.

A saucepan with red cabbage, onions, butter, cinnamon, sugar and more, just before cooking.
Before
A saucepan with a small amount of homogenous slow-cooked red cabbage in it.
After

It tasted delicious, but I’m not 100% convinced it was worth 2.5h of simmering and the house smelling like a brasserie for the next two days.

I was considering posting about how cleverly the labels are attached in the new Diesel boxer shorts, so they don’t endlessly scratch you, but you’ll have to take my word for it. And not peek.

Finally, the first Amaryllis is now going great guns. Not quite sure why it’s got the mottling on the stalk that makes it look like asparagus, but hey. However, whenever I see vegetation growing this incredibly quickly I’m always reminded of Richard Feynman’s observation that we think of plants as growing out of the ground, when really they grow out of the air.

A slightly rude-looking amaryllis flower stem, with a large bud on top. Sitting on a windowsill with a garden behind.
Look how much it’s grown since last week. And still so suggestively too!

But in general, despite my glum start to the week, Spring is definitely coming, and nature is getting more visible again. Just look at this guy that I saw on the way to the studio the other night:

A tiny frog, on a paving slab next to grass, bathed in torchlight at 11pm.
Hello tiny frog!

Weeknote – 18th Feb – Burgeoning (but also bolstering)

For various reasons, a slightly shorter and bleaker weeknote than usual. But in the meantime, behold my comedy amaryllis!

Nope, I’ve got no reason why it’s developed a bend, either. Or the slight ‘asparagus’ vibes on the stem.

Work-related bits

Lots of stuff going on at work, and although it’s still pretty overwhelming I do think I’m starting to make progress. I’ve got a ton of things I could get involved in, but sometimes I have to let things play their course.

Had some great chats with our business planning people about better use of OKRs as a mindset and process rather than an artefact…and also the difference between business KRs and product KRs.

I also spent a lovely half hour with the person that runs our PMO, who seems utterly decent, but it’s taken six weeks to meet because diaries. We talked a lot about traditional and agile project/product management being a spectrum, and the binary division being sometimes unhelpful. (I’ve worked on some flawlessly executed projects that it turned out no users wanted; I’ve also seen some brilliantly reactive “waterfall” projects; and I’ve seen too many user researchers being accidentally used as business analysts.) We also talked a little about how one downside of agile practices is that it’s far too easy to accidentally start a workstream, and particularly one that’s bigger than you think or doesn’t have enough context or governance around it. My own take is that project initiation in the agile world ought to be taken just as seriously as in the PRINCE2 setup…and rarely is. (Too often I’ve seen teams getting critical emails or slide-decks about five weeks into their work, when they’re already committed to an approach. Or a big business-change assumption turns out to have been ‘obvious’.)

Both of those discussions feel like a chance to really move the governance on our work forward. And, as ever in the new workplace, everyone remains pretty damn lovely.

The teams are all settling into their new OKRs, and as we walk them more in practice I’m getting wiser too. Some of my balancing metrics may be more important than I first thought – even if it’s slightly by accident.

Had a good chat about one new project where we talked about the constraints of the alpha phase through the lens of “a hierarchy of terrible outcomes” – top of which was “we run out of time and are in the same position next year”, but also included “we spend so long agonising about the best solution we should have just chosen the most expensive one anyway”.

I also enjoyed a chat about how we might make some of the slightly-ineffable work behind some of our SEO work a bit more tangible. Nobody on the outside knows how Google’s algorithms work, of course, but it was good being able to turn some of it into hypotheses about what might happen. “Doing [this thing], which people ranking above us are seen to do, could increase our traffic by x%, which might mean y% extra traffic and z% more subscriptions/happier members” is easier to reason with than “best practice. Framing the bet means we can make decisions; not framing it at all means it’s easy to ignore.

I’m starting to look further forward too, for which I feel a bit guilty. The teams have only just fully settled on this quarter’s OKRs (although the direction of travel has been largely consistent), but next week I’m going to have to ask teams to a) report on how they’re doing so far, b) think about plans for the next quarter.

Of course there are actually two layers to the latter. Firstly, what are the engineering side of the team planning to deliver as fully-working code. But also, what experiments are we planning to run in the next quarter to work out what we should build in the quarter after…and to decide if it’s more important than fixing some expensive bits of tech-debt. We’re not quite ready for the “test a hundred ideas this quarter, properly build the top three next quarter”, but I think we’ll start to get there.

Also starting to think about how we handle unplanned work. There’s an entirely reasonable current-affairs-based initiative that’s landed on my desk, but I think it’s too big for side-of-desk for any of the squads…so collectively we have to decide if it’s worth “breaking the sprint” (well, quarter) to adapt to this, if we can wait until the next quarter, or which squad’s KRs matter least.

Miscellany:

  • Been doing a lot of thinking about data and consent and a roadmap to better personalisation/recommendations, but only have questions at this stage.
  • Had a few “I hear you’re thinking the same thing that I’m thinking” DMs – which may be collective delusion, of course.
  • Spent some time with our finance folks talking about ROI on our work. They seem much more than traditional finance people – and we talked about modelling some interesting tradeoffs.
  • Great 5h workshop organised by one of our lead PMs about improving member experience, with some incredibly compelling user insight. As ever, I spotted a better way to tell the story. Can’t remember if I had any ideas of my own.
  • Took part in a really good, well-designed, workshop with selected fellow ELT folk about our 2030 vision. Cited the insight from the workshop above. Also did quite a lot of thinking about Which?’s role in an increasingly “as a service” based world. I may have been quite dystopian in places, and I’m hoping none of the related ideas will ever be needed in practice.

Real Life

Let’s get the trivia out of the way first:

  • Piano’s going pretty well at the moment. I’m getting much more focused, and making a bit more progress on underlying problems. And perhaps starting to build my mental muscles for remembering longer-term musical development.
  • That lovely Roland TR8-S remains enormous fun. I love that you can write a bunch of loops one night, and then come back to perform them better another night. It’s wonderfully improvisational.
  • Met an old school friend for dinner mid-week and we set the world to rights
  • OMG after just over two years my ISA’s finally breaking even again! Still hasn’t recouped any of the lost interest that some unwise fiscal choices/Ukraine may have wreaked, but at least I’m not resenting the lost money (and the people that were involved in losing it) any more.
  • Garden’s starting to kick into life again, which is lovely in some places…and terrifying in others.

Former-colleague Talke shared a fascinating podcast from the FT about remote working and return-to-office. I shared the guest from PwC’s concern about how AI is likely to start chipping away at “early learning jobs” where junior staff can start to pick up principles and ways of working…but I’m not sure their solution of pair-working with senior colleagues is scaleable. I’m also not sure that wider industry has trained managers to be this kind of teacher and coach, nor worked out how to enforce it rather than allowing command-and-control(-and-rot) remain the default. Management remains widely not-quite-good-enough, and now we’re adding new touchy-feely layers to it. I’m not sure this is going to universally end well. Anyway, the podcast is worth a listen. I also liked the episode about managers as shit-fixers, and how most management is additive (creating new processes and friction) rather than about removing friction that’s no longer pulling its weight. An unexpected “subscribe”, and generally nice and short too!

Loved this mural that Kate Leto found on her travels around London last week:

Mural says "I wish I could show you, when you are lonely or in darkness, the astonishing light of your own being".

(Deep breath)

And yes, this weekend Vicky and I headed down to Brighton to go and look at a partly-empty and very cold house where two very warm and larger-than-life people used to live.

We retrieved some family heirlooms, and did a few other essential tasks that needed to be ticked off, but mainly realised the enormity. Of the now, but also the future where we’ll be the people leaving the empty house.

I was the driver and lifter-of-heavy-things or lifter-of-sad-things. Really glad we did it together, but…blimey. It was big. And I’ve decided I’m not quite ready to go back to work after all that – no matter how many episodes of Ted Lasso we’ve managed to comfort-binge on Sunday. So hopefully things will be back to normal by Tuesday.

Make the most of people around you, and stay a team through thick and thin, folks! (In our case, at least there’s comfort in playing Blokus together, with a glass of Marsala on the side.)

Dining table with a blokus game board and countless scattered unplayed pieces.
I won, but only just.

Weeknote 11th Feb – settling in for the medium haul

So it seems that a few more folks at Which? have stumbled across the blog. Hello folks! This is the inside of my head, very much as a work-in-progress. I remember an interview with the Guardian’s Marina Hyde where she said that often she would just start writing and didn’t know what she thought about something until she’d finally finished the column. This is a bit like that…only without necessarily me getting to the point where I truly know what I think. All feedback and assumption-correcting welcome!

The Day Job – sitrep

I’ve been slightly reminded of advice that I used to give to new parents: “weeks four to six are the worst, because you’ve run out of energy reserves, still don’t know what you’re doing, and have very limited positive feedback…but hang on because soon it will be coming”. I ended the working week utterly exhausted, and couldn’t stop yawning on Friday evening – but there are definitely a few things that look like they could be heading in the right direction.

This week was possibly a bit of a record for meetings – somewhere north of 30 I think. I’m even starting to get 15-minute sessions squished into the gaps between other things, but I have to remember that often the meetings *are* the work, not a distraction from it. I was also in the office three days this week as well, which felt pretty full-on, what with the Central Line still playing up.

One delightful upside of being in the office was leaving a 1:1 with one of the Lead PMs…only to see this peak-Which? meeting scheduled in the room straight after me.

Display of forthcoming meetings in a meeting room - with the next session being "cordless drill testing" followed by "social media team".
And then we go back to normal at 2pm

I got to spend a bit of time with three more of our Directors this week – Finance, Content, and Commercial. The chats all seemed to go pretty well. I didn’t use the majority of the stuff I’d prepared, but the things we did get to talk about proved really valuable – and that work definitely wasn’t wasted. Apparently I was mentioned favourably at the Board meeting later in the week, so hopefully it’s the beginning of some good working relationships. I even had some of my concerns properly listened to, rather than just brushed aside – which is something it’ll take a while to get used to after certain corners of the Civil Service. In turn, this is also an unexpected responsibility – fret openly at your own peril!

I sat in a lot of very long demos from some suppliers for a data strategy project that’s been in progress since long before I joined. Often I felt like I was just room-meat, but occasionally my outsider’s eye spotted things that folks much closer to the work hadn’t seen. But I’m still smarting from when one of the people presenting said “like when you learned SQL at school”. I suddenly felt very, very old.

I had a great exchange of emails with our data protection team about some of our personalisation ideas which are related to this work, and was hugely impressed at how transparent and enabling they were. I felt smarter as a result, rather than just better at bureaucracy. This – like the responsibility of fretting too loudly – is going to take some getting used to.

It was great to see loads of the squads adopting the updated OKRs in their check-ins, following all the really fruitful and thoughtful discussions over the last fortnight. But even better was that it moved the conversation about “what and why” forward. Teams are showing new types of data to justify these results, and one session even turned into an interesting discussion about whether the team were even being too hard on themselves – because everyone was happy with progress even if one KR was slipping. We’re collectively getting wiser and more open because of these chats, which can only be a good thing.

It’s worth noting that “Check-ins” at Which? work slightly differently to places I’ve been in before. They’re much closer to a business-centric show-and-tell. There’s nearly always a business sponsor for the work who isn’t part of the product group, and they’ll normally be there – alongside a wide range of other interested parties. So I’ve also been trying to help the teams with their storytelling to make sure they show their work in the right way – rather than getting lost in their own detail. I’m encouraging our product managers to take a much more active role in the framing of everything that’s demonstrated/shown – why it’s been included, and what to take away from it.

As a result of this poking-about in slide decks before they’re shown, I was even able to spot where one of our developers was massively underselling the financial impact of a change they’d made – and helped them revel in their achievement just a little more. “Imagine you’re hosting ‘The Price is Right’…” was how one part of my advice started.

At the other end of the spectrum, one sad recent development is that it turns out one of our Delivery Managers got a new job over Christmas, so we’re going to be recruiting shortly. Watch this space for more info.

I’ve had the chance to spend lots more time with my design counterpart, thinking about the future of our work, and talking about our users. We also did a good walk-and-talk down to Warren St to get banh-mi for lunch, and on the way back he showed me the side-view of our office…which you don’t really take in when only looking at the wedding cake front. No wonder I still get lost in it – it goes back from the Marylebone Road for *miles*!

A very very broad office building, which doesn't even fit into the shot.
The damn thing doesn’t even fit into a single shot.

Anyway, lots of progress…I think. And hopefully soon of it will be more automatic, I’ll have worked out which things are genuinely important, and I won’t be quite so shattered by 6pm on a Friday.

Side Hustles

Spent a great morning working with the Product Lead of a fascinating company called Elysia, who are an offshoot of Williams Advanced Engineering that create AI-based systems for monitoring batteries in cars, buses, trucks and more. A truly unique area that blends physics, business, data science and the environment in some very new ways. We did a lot of thinking together, and there’s a ton more to do as they start to scale up their product function and bring more product people into the business. More news on that soon, too.

As I walked down Bond St to our meeting place, I saw this rather unusual sign…that reveals quite A Particular Mindset.

Railings with a sign saying "sothebys staff only. All non-sotheby's bicycles will be removed".
So presumably they do know which bikes *are* Sotheby’s bikes?

I’ve now got a firm date booked in for when I’ll be helping out an old government friend with some skills assessment stuff.

But on Monday I also got my very last payment through from GDS. The end of nearly ten years of government work. We had some poignant fizz as a result.

Drinking Cremant de Loire in front of the telly
Cheers!

Other Nonsense

I’ve spent a vast amount of this weekend moving the blog, and leaningforward.com, to a new hosting provider. A truly tedious exercise, and a ton of time I won’t get back, but I was getting increasingly uneasy about the previous home. Still waiting for email to start working properly, but I’ll get there. I was also surprised that it took less than three hours for blogspam to start piling up, because I’d not enabled the anti-spam plugin. There are some very focused individuals out there!

Sadly all the editorial-based URLs for articles were briefly broken and just became numbers. Pah. Hopefully I fixed that linkrot before everyone gives up trying to find the older posts.

Really enjoyed the full-length audio version of Mylar Melodies’ chat with Tom Whitwell, inventor of the DIY “Turing Machine” controlled-randomness module that I spectacularly failed to get working a few months ago.

Tom’s day-job is not dissimilar to mine, and I found lots of the conversation very resonant.

  • I’m extremely jealous of his year-long sabbatical.
  • I loved the idea from Robin Sloan that code should be more like home cooking, that you can lash some bits together in your own way to solve a particular problem, and it doesn’t have to be a finished product for the outside world. Tom talks about it more as making toys.
  • Lots of people own guitars and nobody asks why they haven’t made albums; it’s ok to own a lot of synthesisers and not have done so.
  • We know a ton of the same people. And I was nudged into backing Matt Webb’s AI-powered rhyming clock kickstarter as a result.

Watched Saltburn, Oppenheimer, Maestro…and something else that’s fallen from my brain. A lot of Carey Mulligan being brilliant, as ever. Slightly sad that Oppenheimer – a film which so spectacularly fails the Bechdel Test – has won so many plaudits, and I even had a dream where Christopher Nolan won the Oscar and just shouted “shame on you all, this should have gone to ‘Barbie'” from the awards stage.

Loved this article, via Vicky Teinaki, of “Every ‘Best Picture’ winner, ranked by how good a Muppets version would be”. (It’s a bit harsh on ‘Shakespeare in Love’ though. Some people…)

Vicky and I had another reason to celebrate this weekend, the details of which can wait for another time, but of course headed up to local favourite bistro Provender to celebrate. Barring the odd unexpected phonecall, it was a lovely evening of ‘just the two of us’ being ‘just the two of us’. We also headed off for some retail therapy to Bluewater today, which was a total blast from the past, as we probably first started going there when we lived in South London about twenty years ago. It was nice to see it pulling through a slightly ‘meh’ patch pre-pandemic, when it looked like many of the original tenants were shutting up. Thankfully we managed to avoid getting sucked into Penhaligon’s, where only delightful financial ruin awaits.

A finished starter on one side of the table, some goats cheese salad in progress on the other.
This was a very nice pigeon-based thing. Which lasted less time than the phonecall.

And finally: I realised belatedly, following on from last week’s post, that the reason I don’t drink the £5-a-bottle wine that’s in the cellar because it’s now “special occasion wine” – and will buy supermarket wine for more instead – is because I chose it. I spent hours wondering which of the possible wines I’d choose, so now it now has back-story, however illogical from an economic viewpoint.

On and up!

And done…hopefully

OK, so this should mean that everything has now moved over safely – and everything’s now really on www.leaningforward.com’s new hosting space, rather than the fake playground I created yesterday. Let me know if you spot anything weird. Ta!

Weeknote – 3rd Feb – Stockpiling

We’ll come back to this embarrassment later, I promise.

It’s been a busy week of collecting things together and trying to work out what to do with them all. And in what order. Problems, ideas, data, projects and – as you can see above – wine.

It’s a slightly weird weekend, and I’m feeling a big listless. It’s just me and the youngest in the house until Monday evening, as Vicky’s off in Norwich for the weekend helping our daughter settle back into university and breathing out after a biiiiiig week chez Dolan.

The day job

I’m starting to get to the point where the pile of things to get my head around at Which? is starting to stabilise, which is something of a relief. I think I’ve now had my last thing-that-sounds-like-another-thing-but-is-actually-completely-different. Most of the nouns in conversations are now things I’ve already heard of. And some of them I even lightly understand.

The mental model of how we work is starting to take shape and feel a bit more solid now. I realised this when I was able to go a bit Lean about the interface between two teams. Yes, there are loads of problems, but in our user adoption the biggest bottleneck is right here – so any work after that is wasted, and any work ahead of it is just creating more disappointed users. I think I’m going to be using theory of constraints a lot, and pressing copies of The Goal or The Phoenix Project into a few people’s hands.

The overall 4-dimensional sankey diagram of how we most effectively make money for the charity is going to take a lot longer to form but it’s nice to see one part feel tangible.

I’ve had another great session about the underlying technology with one of our Engineering managers where they took me through our publishing stack, and how various feeds come together to appear on the page or in the app – be it a review, an article, a supplier price or whatever – and making sure people only get to see what they’re entitled to. There are a few curious choices in there, but you have to remember the prime directive – this would have been the best choice at the time, and we’re all only narrowly escaping creating New Legacy ourselves. There’s some quite big bits of data engineering going on to keep the platform together, which gives us some other good things to build on. It also looks like it’s finally time to get my head around the mental model behind GraphQL, and possibly even Node. Just at the point where I could passably understand Python. (Sob).

I’m also pleased that I’ve started getting my head around some of the underlying business data. How many users we have, conversion rates to members, which content is popular, lifetime value – that sort of thing. I’ve been flying slightly blind when coaching the teams through OKRs and trying to get them to explain value in more business terms – but hopefully I’ll be able to start doing my own triangulation going forward.

One of the things I’m continually having to try and remind people of is that more key results doesn’t always mean more work. Done right, it should mean better and more valuable work. I suspect it’s scar tissue from a slight feature-team or delivery-team past, but hopefully folks will start to understand through our checkins that it’s about helping them focus. Yes, do your original ideas, and it’s great if the big metric goes up (KR1) – but there’s a strategic aspect to that which really matters, so we need to measure that as well (KR2). PS while doing this, please don’t trash another important outcome (KR3).

Key Results should help you choose what to work on, or know if you’ve succeeded – they’re valuable constraints, not extra tasks. If they don’t, they’re probably not right.

(That being said, I’ve doubtless completely misunderstood at least one of them, but we’ll all learn together.)

I’m also starting to look a little bit to the future. There are a lot of initiatives in the air/on slide decks, and they all sound pretty sensible, but I don’t think they can all necessarily be as valuable (to the organisation and users) as each other. I wonder if we need to decide whether properly doing fewer – so that users are genuinely delighted and come in droves – will deliver more for the bottom line than MVP versions of them all. And work out how we choose which children to save. Conversations to have, and lots to learn as a result.

Next week I’ve got three more chats with other members of the Leadership Team – covering finance, content and commercial. The one last week – people – was fascinating and thought-provoking, but she also said “I know a shirt company I think you’d like, I’ll dig them out!”

Early next morning, an email arrives with a few documents we’d discussed, but also: “They’re called Simon Carter”.

I look in the wardrobe at the shirt I’m about to put on.

Yes, it turns out I would like Simon Carter shirts. (But, being fair, only at sale prices)

Extra-curricular activities

On Thursday I went to an interesting CPO Track event in Monzo’s offices, which was billed as “Brian Chesky vs Eric Reis – The Do’s and Don’ts of scaling at pace”. The panel had great folks from Monzo and Paysend, plus lovely Dave Wascha – ex of Zoopla and much else, so I was looking forward to hearing about how to avoid teams treading on each other’s toes etc. It turned out that this wasn’t the essay question the panel had in mind. This was a discussion about how the economic climate has changed, and how product folk are running out of time to start understanding how to deliver business value. As Dave said, so much of our practice and dogma around being user-focused can come across as being just arrogant and oblivious to the fact that we also need to help our organisations make or save money – by delivering more value than we cost. (He also said that he’d been utterly guilty of this himself in the past!)

I was lucky to be sitting between Emily Tate and Robin Zaragosa, and we were all slightly going “yes 1000%” under our breath. Emily rootled around on her phone and dug out a Marty Cagan blog post saying pretty much the same from – I think – 2017. Certainly he says it in this post about Value and Viability from early 2022. I was trying to thread this into the planning and financial aspects of my attempt at the new Product Manager DDaT framework. This wider responsibility is definitely something we’re going to have to step up to as a profession.

So, not what I was expecting, but useful nonetheless. And wonderful to meet so many other great people like Ines and Lyndsey, too. Sadly I couldn’t stay for the networking bit, but I hope everyone had a good time – and I look forward to the next one. And I’m cursing myself for not taking any photos.

Elsewhere, workwise:

So yes, no shortage of things on. Stockpiling projects galore.

Real Life

Very little culture to report this week. Unsurprising as the big family event was the funeral of David – Vicky’s stepdad. He turned out to have had an even more interesting life (and been more of a rogue) than we’d imagined. Much laughter, quite a few tears.

At the wake there was an open mic moment for tributes, and my daughter gave a truly touching tribute from our side of the family…and from the younger generation’s view. Barely a dry eye in the house, and so many family friends (and the other grandchildren) congratulated her on it afterwards. So well done D for telling our story!

It was a late and long day, that ended with a large amount of cheese – just as he’d have wanted.

Anyway, that’s another reason why Vicky is away right now – resetting after all of that. The two of us left in London are enjoying the sudden switch to a largely bacon-based diet, obviously.

[Don’t worry, the wine bit is coming soon.]

Books: Still hugely enjoying Steven Johnson’s “Wonderland”. He’s just been musing on why it took so long for statistics to emerge, and thinks it could only have been spotted once people stopped playing with bones or handmade dice, and regular ‘fair’ dice became normal. Until then, there was simply too much noise to spot it. He’s also talked about chess travelling further and faster than any language, and dead ends in new rules that people tried introducing. Just another wide-ranging and inspiring read from him.

Music: Obviously I’m still processing the enormous blowout last week, but it was also bandcamp Friday, so it felt foolish not to slip a few quid to people.

  • Pre-ordered the new Justice album, but also finally bought ‘Cross’ and the super-joyously-silly Gaspard Augé solo album “Escapades” (“look now I’m over-channeling Alan Parsons Project, now I’m over-channeling Asia, now I’m over-channeling Nick Kershaw”).
  • Cate Brooks has a new album. The preview track is a bit of a long evolving drone, so I’m hoping the rest will reveal itself. But hey, supporting trans modular artists is important.
  • Instrumental of Public Service Broadcasting’s “Inform Educate and Entertain”
  • Bonobo’s “Fragments”. Have listened to this loads on Spotify and it was Just Time. Although “Otomo” doesn’t sound anywhere near as good at domestic volume and without Anna Lapwood on the organ.

Also, that bloody drum machine turns out to have been such a joyous and inspired purchase. I love it. The family love it. So very very playable. I wasn’t expecting that.

So the wine, then…

Now, I know this is going to come as a surprise to some of you who’ve been on a night out with me, but it turns out I’m not drinking wine fast enough.

Every year, the lovely people at The Wine Society send me brochures saying “would you like to buy some Rhone/Burgundy/Claret en primeur”. This basically means “pre-buy it while it’s still in France”, and means you can get wines that are rarer or made by producers who can’t create at the quantities that supermarkets demand. And yes, it’s almost the only way you can get hold of £600/bottle Hermitage, but mainly I use it as a way to get nice local wines at the £5-12/bottle mark which you wouldn’t get elsewhere. If I’m feeling flush, I’ll sometimes look at the £30/bottle mark…but usually chicken out. It’s just a bloody drink, after all.

Anyway, you order this stuff, and then it turns up and sits in the Wine Society’s warehouse – and you have to pay the VAT and Duty (which you’d forgotten about when first ordering, but hey), after which it’s yours. I’ve got quite a lot of boxes downstairs in the cellar, and it’s become a really good source of “special occasion” wine. We’ve not got tons of space, so I’ve also kept some of it stored in the Wine Society’s own warehouse in the meantime – they charge a few quid per case per year, and it’s all properly temperature controlled and everything.

Only a few weeks ago, late at night after a few glasses, I got an email about the forthcoming year’s storage charge and went “wow, I’m not paying that” and immediately ordered everything that was now drinkable to be delivered to me at home. Without really looking to see how much that actually was.

Anyway, on Monday, 96 bottles of wine turned up, and thereby took up quite a large chunk of the kitchen. That’s the photo at the top of this post.

I’ve realised that I’d forgotten that most of it is plonk. Sometimes GOOD plonk, but there’s only a tiny bit that’s destined to be saved for birthdays and suchlike. But it’s all just down there in boxes, being a bit impenetrable other than with “drink by” dates written in sharpie on the label, which you can’t see from the shelf.

So I decided to make sure every box was properly labelled with the dates on every side, as well as how much the damn stuff cost, so I don’t save it forever.

Yes, two of these wines are the same, but from different years. I know, I know…

It was still a bit of a mountain, but it was a usable mountain, and in the hall rather than the kitchen. After which I embarked on some epic clearing, rationalisation and tessalation, and somehow have managed to find space for all those bottles down in the cellar.

I was so taken with how useful I found this labelling, I then went and found the prices and dates for everything else and marked them up on every corner too. So now my wine is much more like a menu – I can choose something for a given date and price point.

Yes, that’s *another* different year of the Clos de Cazaux top-dead-centre.

(It’s worth stressing that I don’t have a wine cellar, I have a cellar that has wine in it. It’s important to keep your vintage port next to the drill bits, and your Vacqueyras next to the baked beans.)

Anyway, it’s now super usable, I won’t need to rely so much on supermarket orders, and I’ve found the whole organising and labelling super-satisfying.

I’m skipping a party because I’m feeling full of cold, so maybe it’s time to open a nice hearty red to warm the cockles, eh?